[Hamara-devel] rolling or fixed release?

[Raju D. Vindane]

At bottom,
On 03/02/2015 11:10 PM, Amardeep Singh wrote:
> I would say rolling release is best. The fixed release approach is good
> but only when you have number of bugs and version upgrades of packages.
>
> For day to day bugs rolling release or even updates seems fine to me.
>
> Amardeep
>
> On Monday 02 March 2015 11:00 PM, Vikas Tara wrote:
>> What does everyone think the best approach for hamara linux should be?
>>
>> Some say that a rolling release approach is less stable or only for
>> super users, but I'm not sure.
>>
>> If patches are applied and packages tested carefully via the
>> developers repo - then maybe rolling release is
>> a better way to enhance user experience?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hamara-devel mailing list
>> Hamara-devel at lists.hamaralinux.org
>> http://lists.hamaralinux.org/listinfo/hamara-devel

I know of two main OS which are having rolling releases, PCLinuxOS and Arch.
While Arch is focused mainly around Experienced users, PCLinuxOS is 
widely used
and is having quite a bit of big community around it. Our aim should be 
to make Hamara a
rolling release distribution and still keep it as simple as possible for 
the user.

Raju