[Hamara-devel] Fwd: Re: Ubiquity Packaging work

Vikas Tara vik at hamaralinux.org
Tue Mar 29 13:26:06 BST 2016


On 29/03/16 13:23, Raju DV wrote:
>
>
> On मंगळवार 29 मार्च 2016 05:46 म.नं., Vikas Tara wrote:
>> On 29/03/16 13:08, Raju DV wrote:
>>> I tried removing xkb-data-i18n from control and building the pacakge,
>>> following is the build log
>>>
>>> https://paste.hamaralinux.org/?9f0a89b7bcc15acb#SuYoCuOJGfNkMnJnykyZysVQX+bAMKs2TgV+/sn6fvY=
>>>
>>> It is not getting built, and is complaining with line # 35 in 
>>> debian/rules file.
>> Now your fun starts :)
> Now I started enjoying this. :)
>>
>> The actual error is further up in the log
>>
>>> |configure:15394: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "glib-2.0 
>>> gtk+-3.0 >= $GTK3_REQUIRED indicator3-0.4 >= $INDICATOR_REQUIRED 
>>> libido3-0.1 >= $IDO_REQUIRED x11" Requested 'indicator3-0.4 >= 
>>> 12.10.2' but version of libindicator3 is 0.5.0 Requested 
>>> 'libido3-0.1 >= 13.10.1' but version of libido is 0.3.4 
>>> configure:15401: $? = 1 configure:15423: $PKG_CONFIG --exists 
>>> --print-errors "glib-2.0 gtk+-3.0 >= $GTK3_REQUIRED indicator3-0.4 
>>> >= $INDICATOR_REQUIRED libido3-0.1 >= $IDO_REQUIRED x11" Requested 
>>> 'indicator3-0.4 >= 12.10.2' but version of libindicator3 is 0.5.0 
>>> Requested 'libido3-0.1 >= 13.10.1' but version of libido is 0.3.4 
>>> configure:15430: $? = 1 configure:15448: result: no Requested 
>>> 'indicator3-0.4 >= 12.10.2' but version of libindicator3 is 0.5.0 
>>> Requested 'libido3-0.1 >= 13.10.1' but version of libido is 0.3.4 
>>> configure:15472: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 gtk+-3.0 >= 
>>> 3.1.4 indicator3-0.4 >= 12.10.2 libido3-0.1 >= 13.10.1 x11) were not 
>>> met: Requested 'indicator3-0.4 >= 12.10.2' but version of 
>>> libindicator3 is 0.5.0 Requested 'libido3-0.1 >= 13.10.1' but 
>>> version of libido is 0.3.4 |
>>
>>
> will resolve these dependencies and let you guys know.
I don't really believe this

> |Requested 'libido3-0.1 >= 13.10.1' but version of libido is 0.3.4|
More likely that Ubuntu has different version numbering than actually 
being that far ahead?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hamaralinux.org/pipermail/hamara-devel/attachments/20160329/dbf66506/attachment.html>


More information about the Hamara-devel mailing list