[Hamara-devel] Fwd: Re: update on lxde accessibility

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Quoting Krishnakant (2016-03-30 18:54:47)
> On Wednesday 30 March 2016 08:55 PM, Vikas Tara wrote:
>> On 30/03/16 16:18, Krishnakant wrote:
>>> And Mate as I use it now I see it is really very low on memory 
>>> footprint and as you rightly pointed out it is as good as a 
>>> modernized gnome 2 interface.
>> I haven't used it in quite a while - does anyone have a view on it's 
>> performance vs lxde?
>>
>> As a desktop it's probably more fully featured - I just remember that 
>> gnome 2 did seem to get bloated towards the end.
>
> It is basically not Gnome 2 verbatim.
> They have used the interface from gnome 2 but all libraries, inter 
> process communication, ATSPI etc is performant and has nothing to do 
> with gnome 2.

Are you sure _all_ libraries are replaced?

I believe _some_ libraries have been replaced, while the rest are only 
renamed, to ease distinguishing them as the fork they are.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.hamaralinux.org/pipermail/hamara-devel/attachments/20160330/937fcdee/attachment.sig>